EUNIS 2007 Evaluation

EUNIS 2007 Grenoble evaluation form

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

1. Presentations

 

 

 

 

The value to you of the conference

1

7

20

13

The appropriateness of the presentations to the themes

1

9

28

2

The overall quality of the presentations

1

14

24

1

Total 1

3

30

72

16

 

2%

25%

60%

13%

2. Organization

 

 

 

 

The efficiency and friendliness of the organising staff

1

0

10

32

The efficiency of booking and registration process

2

4

20

16

The organisation during the event

0

5

16

21

The quality of the venue

1

4

12

23

Total 2

4

13

58

92

 

2%

8%

35%

55%

3. Accommodation

 

 

 

 

The suitability and quality of your hotel accommodation

2

7

23

7

The quality of lunches

2

6

19

15

The quality of evening events

1

1

13

23

Total 3

5

14

55

45

 

4%

12%

46%

38%

4. Overall opinion

 

 

 

 

Your opinion of the event as a whole

1

1

25

14

The amount of free time to network, etc

0

11

17

11

The likelihood of your attending future EUNIS events

1

2

15

21

Total 4

2

14

57

46

 

2%

12%

48%

39%

 

 

 

 

 

Total

14

71

242

199

 

3%

13%

46%

38%

 

 

 

 

 

Summary of the critics:

 

 

 

 

                          Too many and too short presentations

 

 

 

 

                          Random sessions

 

 

 

 

                          Use joint theaters, preferably in the same building

 

 

 

 

                          Poor wireless connections

 

 

 

 

                          Do more BoF

 

 

 

 

                         Arrange a short poster session  (1 hour)

 

 

 

 

EUNIS 2007 Evaluation