EUNIS 2007 Grenoble evaluation form |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poor |
Fair |
Good |
Excellent |
1. Presentations |
|
|
|
|
The value to you of the conference |
1 |
7 |
20 |
13 |
The appropriateness of the presentations to the themes |
1 |
9 |
28 |
2 |
The overall quality of the presentations |
1 |
14 |
24 |
1 |
Total 1 |
3 |
30 |
72 |
16 |
|
2% |
25% |
60% |
13% |
2. Organization |
|
|
|
|
The efficiency and friendliness of the organising staff |
1 |
0 |
10 |
32 |
The efficiency of booking and registration process |
2 |
4 |
20 |
16 |
The organisation during the event |
0 |
5 |
16 |
21 |
The quality of the venue |
1 |
4 |
12 |
23 |
Total 2 |
4 |
13 |
58 |
92 |
|
2% |
8% |
35% |
55% |
3. Accommodation |
|
|
|
|
The suitability and quality of your hotel accommodation |
2 |
7 |
23 |
7 |
The quality of lunches |
2 |
6 |
19 |
15 |
The quality of evening events |
1 |
1 |
13 |
23 |
Total 3 |
5 |
14 |
55 |
45 |
|
4% |
12% |
46% |
38% |
4. Overall opinion |
|
|
|
|
Your opinion of the event as a whole |
1 |
1 |
25 |
14 |
The amount of free time to network, etc |
0 |
11 |
17 |
11 |
The likelihood of your attending future EUNIS events |
1 |
2 |
15 |
21 |
Total 4 |
2 |
14 |
57 |
46 |
|
2% |
12% |
48% |
39% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
14 |
71 |
242 |
199 |
|
3% |
13% |
46% |
38% |
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of the critics: |
|
|
|
|
Too many and too short presentations |
|
|
|
|
Random sessions |
|
|
|
|
Use joint theaters, preferably in the same building |
|
|
|
|
Poor wireless connections |
|
|
|
|
Do more BoF |
|
|
|
|
Arrange a short poster session (1 hour) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |